Cargando…
Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study
CONTEXT: Medical interns (interns) find prescribing challenging and many report lacking readiness when commencing work. Errors in prescribing puts patients’ safety at risk. Yet error rates remain high, despite education, supervision and pharmacists’ contributions. Feedback on prescribing may improve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04095-6 |
_version_ | 1784902549479882752 |
---|---|
author | Coombes, Ian Donovan, Peter Bullock, Brooke Mitchell, Charles Noble, Christy |
author_facet | Coombes, Ian Donovan, Peter Bullock, Brooke Mitchell, Charles Noble, Christy |
author_sort | Coombes, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Medical interns (interns) find prescribing challenging and many report lacking readiness when commencing work. Errors in prescribing puts patients’ safety at risk. Yet error rates remain high, despite education, supervision and pharmacists’ contributions. Feedback on prescribing may improve performance. Yet, work-based prescribing feedback practices focus on rectifying errors. We aimed to explore if prescribing can be improved using a theory-informed feedback intervention. METHODS: In this pre-post study, we designed and implemented a constructivist-theory informed prescribing feedback intervention, informed by Feedback-Mark 2 Theory. Interns commencing internal medicine terms in two Australian teaching hospitals were invited to engage in the feedback intervention. Their prescribing was evaluated by comparing errors per medication order of at least 30 orders per intern. Pre/baseline (weeks 1–3) were compared with post intervention (weeks 8–9). Interns’ baseline prescribing audit findings were analysed and discussed at individualised feedback sessions. These sessions were with a clinical pharmacologist (Site 1) and a pharmacist educator (Site 2). RESULTS: Eighty eight intern’s prescribing over five 10-week terms was analysed from two hospitals. The frequency of prescribing errors significantly reduced at both sites after the intervention, across all five terms (p < 0.001).There were initially 1598 errors in 2750 orders (median [IQR] 0.48 [0.35–0.67] errors per order) and after the intervention 1113 errors in 2694 orders (median [IQR] 0.30 [0.17–0.50] errors per order). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest interns’ prescribing practices may improve as a result of constructivist -theory learner centred, informed feedback with an agreed plan. This novel intervention, contributed, to a reduction in interns’ prescribing errors. This study suggests new strategies for improving prescribing safety should include the design and implementation of theory-informed feedback interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04095-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9993618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99936182023-03-09 Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study Coombes, Ian Donovan, Peter Bullock, Brooke Mitchell, Charles Noble, Christy BMC Med Educ Research CONTEXT: Medical interns (interns) find prescribing challenging and many report lacking readiness when commencing work. Errors in prescribing puts patients’ safety at risk. Yet error rates remain high, despite education, supervision and pharmacists’ contributions. Feedback on prescribing may improve performance. Yet, work-based prescribing feedback practices focus on rectifying errors. We aimed to explore if prescribing can be improved using a theory-informed feedback intervention. METHODS: In this pre-post study, we designed and implemented a constructivist-theory informed prescribing feedback intervention, informed by Feedback-Mark 2 Theory. Interns commencing internal medicine terms in two Australian teaching hospitals were invited to engage in the feedback intervention. Their prescribing was evaluated by comparing errors per medication order of at least 30 orders per intern. Pre/baseline (weeks 1–3) were compared with post intervention (weeks 8–9). Interns’ baseline prescribing audit findings were analysed and discussed at individualised feedback sessions. These sessions were with a clinical pharmacologist (Site 1) and a pharmacist educator (Site 2). RESULTS: Eighty eight intern’s prescribing over five 10-week terms was analysed from two hospitals. The frequency of prescribing errors significantly reduced at both sites after the intervention, across all five terms (p < 0.001).There were initially 1598 errors in 2750 orders (median [IQR] 0.48 [0.35–0.67] errors per order) and after the intervention 1113 errors in 2694 orders (median [IQR] 0.30 [0.17–0.50] errors per order). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest interns’ prescribing practices may improve as a result of constructivist -theory learner centred, informed feedback with an agreed plan. This novel intervention, contributed, to a reduction in interns’ prescribing errors. This study suggests new strategies for improving prescribing safety should include the design and implementation of theory-informed feedback interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04095-6. BioMed Central 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9993618/ /pubmed/36882779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04095-6 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Coombes, Ian Donovan, Peter Bullock, Brooke Mitchell, Charles Noble, Christy Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study |
title | Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study |
title_full | Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study |
title_fullStr | Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study |
title_short | Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study |
title_sort | can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? a pre-post study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04095-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coombesian cananovelconstructivisttheoryinformedfeedbackinterventionreduceprescribingerrorsaprepoststudy AT donovanpeter cananovelconstructivisttheoryinformedfeedbackinterventionreduceprescribingerrorsaprepoststudy AT bullockbrooke cananovelconstructivisttheoryinformedfeedbackinterventionreduceprescribingerrorsaprepoststudy AT mitchellcharles cananovelconstructivisttheoryinformedfeedbackinterventionreduceprescribingerrorsaprepoststudy AT noblechristy cananovelconstructivisttheoryinformedfeedbackinterventionreduceprescribingerrorsaprepoststudy |