Cargando…
Why Most Biomedical Findings Echoed by Newspapers Turn Out to be False: The Case of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
CONTEXT: Because positive biomedical observations are more often published than those reporting no effect, initial observations are often refuted or attenuated by subsequent studies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether newspapers preferentially report on initial findings and whether they also report on...
Autores principales: | Gonon, François, Konsman, Jan-Pieter, Cohen, David, Boraud, Thomas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22984483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044275 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers
por: Dumas-Mallet, Estelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Misrepresentation of Neuroscience Data Might Give Rise to Misleading Conclusions in the Media: The Case of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
por: Gonon, Francois, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Why the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Matters
por: Hamed, Alaa M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
por: Ioannidis, John P. A.
Publicado: (2005) -
Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains
por: Dumas-Mallet, Estelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)