Cargando…
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide
Peer review has been defined as a process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. It functions to encourage authors to meet the accepted high standards of their discipline and to control the dissemination of research da...
Autores principales: | Kelly, Jacalyn, Sadeghieh, Tara, Adeli, Khosrow |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683470 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: Revising a Peer-reviewed Manuscript
por: Bahadoran, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Peer review: Heart and soul of scientific publication
por: Jain, Anil K
Publicado: (2009) -
Suicide Risk Assessments: A Scientific and Ethical Critique
por: Smith, Mike
Publicado: (2022) -
Inaccuracy in the Scientific Record and Open Postpublication Critique
por: Brewin, Chris R.
Publicado: (2023) -
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
por: Hunter, Jane
Publicado: (2012)