Cargando…
A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS
BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and usually fatal neurodegenerative disease. Survival from diagnosis varies considerably. Several prognostic factors are known, including site of onset (bulbar or limb), age at symptom onset, delay from onset to diagnosis and the use o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27378085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-312908 |
_version_ | 1782471767937253376 |
---|---|
author | Knibb, Jonathan A Keren, Noa Kulka, Anna Leigh, P Nigel Martin, Sarah Shaw, Christopher E Tsuda, Miho Al-Chalabi, Ammar |
author_facet | Knibb, Jonathan A Keren, Noa Kulka, Anna Leigh, P Nigel Martin, Sarah Shaw, Christopher E Tsuda, Miho Al-Chalabi, Ammar |
author_sort | Knibb, Jonathan A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and usually fatal neurodegenerative disease. Survival from diagnosis varies considerably. Several prognostic factors are known, including site of onset (bulbar or limb), age at symptom onset, delay from onset to diagnosis and the use of riluzole and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Clinicians and patients would benefit from a practical way of using these factors to provide an individualised prognosis. METHODS: 575 consecutive patients with incident ALS from a population-based registry in South-East England register for ALS (SEALS) were studied. Their survival was modelled as a two-step process: the time from diagnosis to respiratory muscle involvement, followed by the time from respiratory involvement to death. The effects of predictor variables were assessed separately for each time interval. FINDINGS: Younger age at symptom onset, longer delay from onset to diagnosis and riluzole use were associated with slower progression to respiratory involvement, and NIV use was associated with lower mortality after respiratory involvement, each with a clinically significant effect size. Riluzole may have a greater effect in younger patients and those with longer delay to diagnosis. A patient's survival time has a roughly 50% chance of falling between half and twice the predicted median. INTERPRETATION: A simple and clinically applicable graphical method of predicting an individual patient's survival from diagnosis is presented. The model should be validated in an independent cohort, and extended to include other important prognostic factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5136716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51367162016-12-08 A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS Knibb, Jonathan A Keren, Noa Kulka, Anna Leigh, P Nigel Martin, Sarah Shaw, Christopher E Tsuda, Miho Al-Chalabi, Ammar J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Neurodegeneration BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and usually fatal neurodegenerative disease. Survival from diagnosis varies considerably. Several prognostic factors are known, including site of onset (bulbar or limb), age at symptom onset, delay from onset to diagnosis and the use of riluzole and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Clinicians and patients would benefit from a practical way of using these factors to provide an individualised prognosis. METHODS: 575 consecutive patients with incident ALS from a population-based registry in South-East England register for ALS (SEALS) were studied. Their survival was modelled as a two-step process: the time from diagnosis to respiratory muscle involvement, followed by the time from respiratory involvement to death. The effects of predictor variables were assessed separately for each time interval. FINDINGS: Younger age at symptom onset, longer delay from onset to diagnosis and riluzole use were associated with slower progression to respiratory involvement, and NIV use was associated with lower mortality after respiratory involvement, each with a clinically significant effect size. Riluzole may have a greater effect in younger patients and those with longer delay to diagnosis. A patient's survival time has a roughly 50% chance of falling between half and twice the predicted median. INTERPRETATION: A simple and clinically applicable graphical method of predicting an individual patient's survival from diagnosis is presented. The model should be validated in an independent cohort, and extended to include other important prognostic factors. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5136716/ /pubmed/27378085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-312908 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Neurodegeneration Knibb, Jonathan A Keren, Noa Kulka, Anna Leigh, P Nigel Martin, Sarah Shaw, Christopher E Tsuda, Miho Al-Chalabi, Ammar A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS |
title | A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS |
title_full | A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS |
title_fullStr | A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS |
title_full_unstemmed | A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS |
title_short | A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS |
title_sort | clinical tool for predicting survival in als |
topic | Neurodegeneration |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27378085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-312908 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knibbjonathana aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT kerennoa aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT kulkaanna aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT leighpnigel aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT martinsarah aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT shawchristophere aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT tsudamiho aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT alchalabiammar aclinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT knibbjonathana clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT kerennoa clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT kulkaanna clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT leighpnigel clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT martinsarah clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT shawchristophere clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT tsudamiho clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals AT alchalabiammar clinicaltoolforpredictingsurvivalinals |