Cargando…

Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?

Current birth registration systems fail to serve adequately the interests of those born as a result of gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy. In the UK, changes to the birth registration system have been piecemeal, reactive and situation-specific and no information is recorded about gamete donors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crawshaw, Marilyn A, Blyth, Eric D, Feast, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.004
_version_ 1783323265300692992
author Crawshaw, Marilyn A
Blyth, Eric D
Feast, Julia
author_facet Crawshaw, Marilyn A
Blyth, Eric D
Feast, Julia
author_sort Crawshaw, Marilyn A
collection PubMed
description Current birth registration systems fail to serve adequately the interests of those born as a result of gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy. In the UK, changes to the birth registration system have been piecemeal, reactive and situation-specific and no information is recorded about gamete donors. Birth registration has thereby become a statement of legal parentage and citizenship only, without debate as to whether it should serve any wider functions. This sits uneasily with the increasingly accepted human right to know one’s genetic and gestational as well as legal parents, and the duty of the State to facilitate that right. This commentary sets out one possible model for reform to better ensure that those affected become aware of, and/or have access to, knowledge about their origins and that such information is stored and released effectively without compromising individual privacy. Among other features, our proposal links the birth registration system and the information stored in the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority’s Register of Information, although further work than we have been able to undertake here is necessary to ensure a better fit where cross-border treatment services or informal arrangements have been involved. The time for debate and reform is well overdue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59528222018-05-17 Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction? Crawshaw, Marilyn A Blyth, Eric D Feast, Julia Reprod Biomed Soc Online Sociology and Social Policy Current birth registration systems fail to serve adequately the interests of those born as a result of gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy. In the UK, changes to the birth registration system have been piecemeal, reactive and situation-specific and no information is recorded about gamete donors. Birth registration has thereby become a statement of legal parentage and citizenship only, without debate as to whether it should serve any wider functions. This sits uneasily with the increasingly accepted human right to know one’s genetic and gestational as well as legal parents, and the duty of the State to facilitate that right. This commentary sets out one possible model for reform to better ensure that those affected become aware of, and/or have access to, knowledge about their origins and that such information is stored and released effectively without compromising individual privacy. Among other features, our proposal links the birth registration system and the information stored in the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority’s Register of Information, although further work than we have been able to undertake here is necessary to ensure a better fit where cross-border treatment services or informal arrangements have been involved. The time for debate and reform is well overdue. Elsevier 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5952822/ /pubmed/29774260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.004 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Sociology and Social Policy
Crawshaw, Marilyn A
Blyth, Eric D
Feast, Julia
Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?
title Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?
title_full Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?
title_fullStr Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?
title_full_unstemmed Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?
title_short Can the UK’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?
title_sort can the uk’s birth registration system better serve the interests of those born following collaborative assisted reproduction?
topic Sociology and Social Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.004
work_keys_str_mv AT crawshawmarilyna cantheuksbirthregistrationsystembetterservetheinterestsofthosebornfollowingcollaborativeassistedreproduction
AT blythericd cantheuksbirthregistrationsystembetterservetheinterestsofthosebornfollowingcollaborativeassistedreproduction
AT feastjulia cantheuksbirthregistrationsystembetterservetheinterestsofthosebornfollowingcollaborativeassistedreproduction