Cargando…
Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection
Atom-probe tomography (APT) facilitates nano- and atomic-scale characterization and analysis of microstructural features. Specifically, APT is well suited to study the interfacial properties of granular or heterophase systems. Traditionally, the identification of the interface between, for precipita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56649-8 |
_version_ | 1783483448770428928 |
---|---|
author | Madireddy, Sandeep Chung, Ding-Wen Loeffler, Troy Sankaranarayanan, Subramanian K. R. S. Seidman, David N. Balaprakash, Prasanna Heinonen, Olle |
author_facet | Madireddy, Sandeep Chung, Ding-Wen Loeffler, Troy Sankaranarayanan, Subramanian K. R. S. Seidman, David N. Balaprakash, Prasanna Heinonen, Olle |
author_sort | Madireddy, Sandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | Atom-probe tomography (APT) facilitates nano- and atomic-scale characterization and analysis of microstructural features. Specifically, APT is well suited to study the interfacial properties of granular or heterophase systems. Traditionally, the identification of the interface between, for precipitate and matrix phases, in APT data has been obtained either by extracting iso-concentration surfaces based on a user-supplied concentration value or by manually perturbing the concentration value until the iso-concentration surface qualitatively matches the interface. These approaches are subjective, not scalable, and may lead to inconsistencies due to local composition inhomogeneities. We introduce a digital image segmentation approach based on deep neural networks that transfer learned knowledge from natural images to automatically segment the data obtained from APT into different phases. This approach not only provides an efficient way to segment the data and extract interfacial properties but does so without the need for expensive interface labeling for training the segmentation model. We consider here a system with a precipitate phase in a matrix and with three different interface modalities—layered, isolated, and interconnected—that are obtained for different relative geometries of the precipitate phase. We demonstrate the accuracy of our segmentation approach through qualitative visualization of the interfaces, as well as through quantitative comparisons with proximity histograms obtained by using more traditional approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6934719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69347192019-12-30 Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection Madireddy, Sandeep Chung, Ding-Wen Loeffler, Troy Sankaranarayanan, Subramanian K. R. S. Seidman, David N. Balaprakash, Prasanna Heinonen, Olle Sci Rep Article Atom-probe tomography (APT) facilitates nano- and atomic-scale characterization and analysis of microstructural features. Specifically, APT is well suited to study the interfacial properties of granular or heterophase systems. Traditionally, the identification of the interface between, for precipitate and matrix phases, in APT data has been obtained either by extracting iso-concentration surfaces based on a user-supplied concentration value or by manually perturbing the concentration value until the iso-concentration surface qualitatively matches the interface. These approaches are subjective, not scalable, and may lead to inconsistencies due to local composition inhomogeneities. We introduce a digital image segmentation approach based on deep neural networks that transfer learned knowledge from natural images to automatically segment the data obtained from APT into different phases. This approach not only provides an efficient way to segment the data and extract interfacial properties but does so without the need for expensive interface labeling for training the segmentation model. We consider here a system with a precipitate phase in a matrix and with three different interface modalities—layered, isolated, and interconnected—that are obtained for different relative geometries of the precipitate phase. We demonstrate the accuracy of our segmentation approach through qualitative visualization of the interfaces, as well as through quantitative comparisons with proximity histograms obtained by using more traditional approaches. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6934719/ /pubmed/31882859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56649-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Madireddy, Sandeep Chung, Ding-Wen Loeffler, Troy Sankaranarayanan, Subramanian K. R. S. Seidman, David N. Balaprakash, Prasanna Heinonen, Olle Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection |
title | Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection |
title_full | Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection |
title_fullStr | Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection |
title_short | Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection |
title_sort | phase segmentation in atom-probe tomography using deep learning-based edge detection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56649-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madireddysandeep phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection AT chungdingwen phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection AT loefflertroy phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection AT sankaranarayanansubramaniankrs phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection AT seidmandavidn phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection AT balaprakashprasanna phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection AT heinonenolle phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection |