Cargando…

Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience

This paper reports the development of a specialized teleguidance-based navigation assistance system for the blind and the visually impaired. We present findings from a usability and user experience study conducted with 11 blind and visually impaired participants and a sighted caretaker. Participants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudary, Babar, Pohjolainen, Sami, Aziz, Saima, Arhippainen, Leena, Pulli, Petri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00536-z
_version_ 1783696521670164480
author Chaudary, Babar
Pohjolainen, Sami
Aziz, Saima
Arhippainen, Leena
Pulli, Petri
author_facet Chaudary, Babar
Pohjolainen, Sami
Aziz, Saima
Arhippainen, Leena
Pulli, Petri
author_sort Chaudary, Babar
collection PubMed
description This paper reports the development of a specialized teleguidance-based navigation assistance system for the blind and the visually impaired. We present findings from a usability and user experience study conducted with 11 blind and visually impaired participants and a sighted caretaker. Participants sent live video feed of their field of view to the remote caretaker’s terminal from a smartphone camera attached to their chest. The caretaker used this video feed to guide them through indoor and outdoor navigation scenarios using a combination of haptic and voice-based communication. Haptic feedback was provided through vibrating actuators installed in the grip of a Smart Cane. Two haptic methods for directional guidance were tested: (1) two vibrating actuators to guide left and right movement and (2) a single vibrating actuator with differentiating vibration patterns for the same purpose. Users feedback was collected using a meCUE 2.0 standardized questionnaire, interviews, and group discussions. Participants’ perceptions toward the proposed navigation assistance system were positive. Blind participants preferred vibrational guidance with two actuators, while partially blind participants preferred the single actuator method. Familiarity with cane use and age were important factors in the choice of haptic methods by both blind and partially blind users. It was found that smartphone camera provided sufficient field of view for remote assistance; position and angle are nonetheless important considerations. Ultimately, more research is needed to confirm our preliminary findings. We also present an expanded evaluation model developed to carry out further research on assistive systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81422952021-05-24 Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience Chaudary, Babar Pohjolainen, Sami Aziz, Saima Arhippainen, Leena Pulli, Petri Virtual Real Notes to production: S.I. : Virtual Reality for Therapy, Psychological Interventions, and Physical and Cognitive Rehabilitation This paper reports the development of a specialized teleguidance-based navigation assistance system for the blind and the visually impaired. We present findings from a usability and user experience study conducted with 11 blind and visually impaired participants and a sighted caretaker. Participants sent live video feed of their field of view to the remote caretaker’s terminal from a smartphone camera attached to their chest. The caretaker used this video feed to guide them through indoor and outdoor navigation scenarios using a combination of haptic and voice-based communication. Haptic feedback was provided through vibrating actuators installed in the grip of a Smart Cane. Two haptic methods for directional guidance were tested: (1) two vibrating actuators to guide left and right movement and (2) a single vibrating actuator with differentiating vibration patterns for the same purpose. Users feedback was collected using a meCUE 2.0 standardized questionnaire, interviews, and group discussions. Participants’ perceptions toward the proposed navigation assistance system were positive. Blind participants preferred vibrational guidance with two actuators, while partially blind participants preferred the single actuator method. Familiarity with cane use and age were important factors in the choice of haptic methods by both blind and partially blind users. It was found that smartphone camera provided sufficient field of view for remote assistance; position and angle are nonetheless important considerations. Ultimately, more research is needed to confirm our preliminary findings. We also present an expanded evaluation model developed to carry out further research on assistive systems. Springer London 2021-05-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC8142295/ /pubmed/34054327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00536-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Notes to production: S.I. : Virtual Reality for Therapy, Psychological Interventions, and Physical and Cognitive Rehabilitation
Chaudary, Babar
Pohjolainen, Sami
Aziz, Saima
Arhippainen, Leena
Pulli, Petri
Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience
title Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience
title_full Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience
title_fullStr Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience
title_full_unstemmed Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience
title_short Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience
title_sort teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience
topic Notes to production: S.I. : Virtual Reality for Therapy, Psychological Interventions, and Physical and Cognitive Rehabilitation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00536-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudarybabar teleguidancebasedremotenavigationassistanceforvisuallyimpairedandblindpeopleusabilityanduserexperience
AT pohjolainensami teleguidancebasedremotenavigationassistanceforvisuallyimpairedandblindpeopleusabilityanduserexperience
AT azizsaima teleguidancebasedremotenavigationassistanceforvisuallyimpairedandblindpeopleusabilityanduserexperience
AT arhippainenleena teleguidancebasedremotenavigationassistanceforvisuallyimpairedandblindpeopleusabilityanduserexperience
AT pullipetri teleguidancebasedremotenavigationassistanceforvisuallyimpairedandblindpeopleusabilityanduserexperience