Cargando…
Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors
Spatial genetic and phenotypic diversity within solid tumors has been well documented. Nevertheless, how this heterogeneity affects temporal dynamics of tumorigenesis has not been rigorously examined because solid tumors do not evolve as the standard population genetic model due to the spatial const...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab335 |
_version_ | 1784639513750929408 |
---|---|
author | Li, Guanghao Yang, Zuyu Wu, Dafei Liu, Sixue Li, Xuening Li, Tao Li, Yawei Liang, Liji Zou, Weilong Wu, Chung-I Wang, Hurng-Yi Lu, Xuemei |
author_facet | Li, Guanghao Yang, Zuyu Wu, Dafei Liu, Sixue Li, Xuening Li, Tao Li, Yawei Liang, Liji Zou, Weilong Wu, Chung-I Wang, Hurng-Yi Lu, Xuemei |
author_sort | Li, Guanghao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatial genetic and phenotypic diversity within solid tumors has been well documented. Nevertheless, how this heterogeneity affects temporal dynamics of tumorigenesis has not been rigorously examined because solid tumors do not evolve as the standard population genetic model due to the spatial constraint. We therefore, propose a neutral spatial (NS) model whereby the mutation accumulation increases toward the periphery; the genealogical relationship is spatially determined and the selection efficacy is blunted (due to kin competition). In this model, neutral mutations are accrued and spatially distributed in manners different from those of advantageous mutations. Importantly, the distinctions could be blurred in the conventional model. To test the NS model, we performed a three-dimensional multiple microsampling of two hepatocellular carcinomas. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed a 2-fold increase in mutations going from the center to the periphery. The operation of natural selection can then be tested by examining the spatially determined clonal relationships and the clonal sizes. Due to limited migration, only the expansion of highly advantageous clones can sweep through a large part of the tumor to reveal the selective advantages. Hence, even multiregional sampling can only reveal a fraction of fitness differences in solid tumors. Our results suggest that the NS patterns are crucial for testing the influence of natural selection during tumorigenesis, especially for small solid tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8788224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87882242022-01-26 Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors Li, Guanghao Yang, Zuyu Wu, Dafei Liu, Sixue Li, Xuening Li, Tao Li, Yawei Liang, Liji Zou, Weilong Wu, Chung-I Wang, Hurng-Yi Lu, Xuemei Mol Biol Evol Discoveries Spatial genetic and phenotypic diversity within solid tumors has been well documented. Nevertheless, how this heterogeneity affects temporal dynamics of tumorigenesis has not been rigorously examined because solid tumors do not evolve as the standard population genetic model due to the spatial constraint. We therefore, propose a neutral spatial (NS) model whereby the mutation accumulation increases toward the periphery; the genealogical relationship is spatially determined and the selection efficacy is blunted (due to kin competition). In this model, neutral mutations are accrued and spatially distributed in manners different from those of advantageous mutations. Importantly, the distinctions could be blurred in the conventional model. To test the NS model, we performed a three-dimensional multiple microsampling of two hepatocellular carcinomas. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed a 2-fold increase in mutations going from the center to the periphery. The operation of natural selection can then be tested by examining the spatially determined clonal relationships and the clonal sizes. Due to limited migration, only the expansion of highly advantageous clones can sweep through a large part of the tumor to reveal the selective advantages. Hence, even multiregional sampling can only reveal a fraction of fitness differences in solid tumors. Our results suggest that the NS patterns are crucial for testing the influence of natural selection during tumorigenesis, especially for small solid tumors. Oxford University Press 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8788224/ /pubmed/34850073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab335 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Discoveries Li, Guanghao Yang, Zuyu Wu, Dafei Liu, Sixue Li, Xuening Li, Tao Li, Yawei Liang, Liji Zou, Weilong Wu, Chung-I Wang, Hurng-Yi Lu, Xuemei Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors |
title | Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors |
title_full | Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors |
title_fullStr | Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors |
title_short | Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors |
title_sort | evolution under spatially heterogeneous selection in solid tumors |
topic | Discoveries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liguanghao evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT yangzuyu evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT wudafei evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT liusixue evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT lixuening evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT litao evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT liyawei evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT liangliji evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT zouweilong evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT wuchungi evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT wanghurngyi evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors AT luxuemei evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors |