Cargando…

Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors

Spatial genetic and phenotypic diversity within solid tumors has been well documented. Nevertheless, how this heterogeneity affects temporal dynamics of tumorigenesis has not been rigorously examined because solid tumors do not evolve as the standard population genetic model due to the spatial const...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Guanghao, Yang, Zuyu, Wu, Dafei, Liu, Sixue, Li, Xuening, Li, Tao, Li, Yawei, Liang, Liji, Zou, Weilong, Wu, Chung-I, Wang, Hurng-Yi, Lu, Xuemei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab335
_version_ 1784639513750929408
author Li, Guanghao
Yang, Zuyu
Wu, Dafei
Liu, Sixue
Li, Xuening
Li, Tao
Li, Yawei
Liang, Liji
Zou, Weilong
Wu, Chung-I
Wang, Hurng-Yi
Lu, Xuemei
author_facet Li, Guanghao
Yang, Zuyu
Wu, Dafei
Liu, Sixue
Li, Xuening
Li, Tao
Li, Yawei
Liang, Liji
Zou, Weilong
Wu, Chung-I
Wang, Hurng-Yi
Lu, Xuemei
author_sort Li, Guanghao
collection PubMed
description Spatial genetic and phenotypic diversity within solid tumors has been well documented. Nevertheless, how this heterogeneity affects temporal dynamics of tumorigenesis has not been rigorously examined because solid tumors do not evolve as the standard population genetic model due to the spatial constraint. We therefore, propose a neutral spatial (NS) model whereby the mutation accumulation increases toward the periphery; the genealogical relationship is spatially determined and the selection efficacy is blunted (due to kin competition). In this model, neutral mutations are accrued and spatially distributed in manners different from those of advantageous mutations. Importantly, the distinctions could be blurred in the conventional model. To test the NS model, we performed a three-dimensional multiple microsampling of two hepatocellular carcinomas. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed a 2-fold increase in mutations going from the center to the periphery. The operation of natural selection can then be tested by examining the spatially determined clonal relationships and the clonal sizes. Due to limited migration, only the expansion of highly advantageous clones can sweep through a large part of the tumor to reveal the selective advantages. Hence, even multiregional sampling can only reveal a fraction of fitness differences in solid tumors. Our results suggest that the NS patterns are crucial for testing the influence of natural selection during tumorigenesis, especially for small solid tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8788224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87882242022-01-26 Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors Li, Guanghao Yang, Zuyu Wu, Dafei Liu, Sixue Li, Xuening Li, Tao Li, Yawei Liang, Liji Zou, Weilong Wu, Chung-I Wang, Hurng-Yi Lu, Xuemei Mol Biol Evol Discoveries Spatial genetic and phenotypic diversity within solid tumors has been well documented. Nevertheless, how this heterogeneity affects temporal dynamics of tumorigenesis has not been rigorously examined because solid tumors do not evolve as the standard population genetic model due to the spatial constraint. We therefore, propose a neutral spatial (NS) model whereby the mutation accumulation increases toward the periphery; the genealogical relationship is spatially determined and the selection efficacy is blunted (due to kin competition). In this model, neutral mutations are accrued and spatially distributed in manners different from those of advantageous mutations. Importantly, the distinctions could be blurred in the conventional model. To test the NS model, we performed a three-dimensional multiple microsampling of two hepatocellular carcinomas. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed a 2-fold increase in mutations going from the center to the periphery. The operation of natural selection can then be tested by examining the spatially determined clonal relationships and the clonal sizes. Due to limited migration, only the expansion of highly advantageous clones can sweep through a large part of the tumor to reveal the selective advantages. Hence, even multiregional sampling can only reveal a fraction of fitness differences in solid tumors. Our results suggest that the NS patterns are crucial for testing the influence of natural selection during tumorigenesis, especially for small solid tumors. Oxford University Press 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8788224/ /pubmed/34850073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab335 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Discoveries
Li, Guanghao
Yang, Zuyu
Wu, Dafei
Liu, Sixue
Li, Xuening
Li, Tao
Li, Yawei
Liang, Liji
Zou, Weilong
Wu, Chung-I
Wang, Hurng-Yi
Lu, Xuemei
Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors
title Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors
title_full Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors
title_fullStr Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors
title_short Evolution under Spatially Heterogeneous Selection in Solid Tumors
title_sort evolution under spatially heterogeneous selection in solid tumors
topic Discoveries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34850073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab335
work_keys_str_mv AT liguanghao evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT yangzuyu evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT wudafei evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT liusixue evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT lixuening evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT litao evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT liyawei evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT liangliji evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT zouweilong evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT wuchungi evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT wanghurngyi evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors
AT luxuemei evolutionunderspatiallyheterogeneousselectioninsolidtumors