Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience

Quantifying individual differences in higher-order cognitive functions is a foundational area of cognitive science that also has profound implications for research on psychopathology. For the past 2 decades, the dominant approach in these fields has been to attempt to fractionate higher-order functi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weigard, Alexander, Sripada, Chandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.02.001
_version_ 1784672247987830784
author Weigard, Alexander
Sripada, Chandra
author_facet Weigard, Alexander
Sripada, Chandra
author_sort Weigard, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Quantifying individual differences in higher-order cognitive functions is a foundational area of cognitive science that also has profound implications for research on psychopathology. For the past 2 decades, the dominant approach in these fields has been to attempt to fractionate higher-order functions into hypothesized components (e.g., inhibition, updating) through a combination of experimental manipulation and factor analysis. However, the putative constructs obtained through this paradigm have recently been met with substantial criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Concurrently, an alternative approach has emerged focusing on parameters of formal computational models of cognition that have been developed in mathematical psychology. These models posit biologically plausible and experimentally validated explanations of the data-generating process for cognitive tasks, allowing them to be used to measure the latent mechanisms that underlie performance. One of the primary insights provided by recent applications of this approach is that individual and clinical differences in performance on a wide variety of cognitive tasks, ranging from simple choice tasks to complex executive paradigms, are largely driven by efficiency of evidence accumulation, a computational mechanism defined by sequential sampling models. This review assembles evidence for the hypothesis that efficiency of evidence accumulation is a central individual difference dimension that explains neurocognitive deficits in multiple clinical disorders and identifies ways in which this insight can advance clinical neuroscience research. We propose that recognition of efficiency of evidence accumulation as a major driver of neurocognitive differences will allow the field to make clearer inferences about cognitive abnormalities in psychopathology and their links to neurobiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8936715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89367152022-03-21 Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience Weigard, Alexander Sripada, Chandra Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci Review Quantifying individual differences in higher-order cognitive functions is a foundational area of cognitive science that also has profound implications for research on psychopathology. For the past 2 decades, the dominant approach in these fields has been to attempt to fractionate higher-order functions into hypothesized components (e.g., inhibition, updating) through a combination of experimental manipulation and factor analysis. However, the putative constructs obtained through this paradigm have recently been met with substantial criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Concurrently, an alternative approach has emerged focusing on parameters of formal computational models of cognition that have been developed in mathematical psychology. These models posit biologically plausible and experimentally validated explanations of the data-generating process for cognitive tasks, allowing them to be used to measure the latent mechanisms that underlie performance. One of the primary insights provided by recent applications of this approach is that individual and clinical differences in performance on a wide variety of cognitive tasks, ranging from simple choice tasks to complex executive paradigms, are largely driven by efficiency of evidence accumulation, a computational mechanism defined by sequential sampling models. This review assembles evidence for the hypothesis that efficiency of evidence accumulation is a central individual difference dimension that explains neurocognitive deficits in multiple clinical disorders and identifies ways in which this insight can advance clinical neuroscience research. We propose that recognition of efficiency of evidence accumulation as a major driver of neurocognitive differences will allow the field to make clearer inferences about cognitive abnormalities in psychopathology and their links to neurobiology. Elsevier 2021-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8936715/ /pubmed/35317408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.02.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Weigard, Alexander
Sripada, Chandra
Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience
title Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience
title_full Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience
title_fullStr Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience
title_short Task-General Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation as a Computationally Defined Neurocognitive Trait: Implications for Clinical Neuroscience
title_sort task-general efficiency of evidence accumulation as a computationally defined neurocognitive trait: implications for clinical neuroscience
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.02.001
work_keys_str_mv AT weigardalexander taskgeneralefficiencyofevidenceaccumulationasacomputationallydefinedneurocognitivetraitimplicationsforclinicalneuroscience
AT sripadachandra taskgeneralefficiencyofevidenceaccumulationasacomputationallydefinedneurocognitivetraitimplicationsforclinicalneuroscience