Cargando…

The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site

A number of previous studies have predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) by exploiting the position of genomic landmarks like the transcriptional start site (TSS). The studies’ methods are generally too computationally intensive for genome-scale investigation, so the full potential of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tharakaraman, Kannan, Bodenreider, Olivier, Landsman, David, Spouge, John L., Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18367472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn137
_version_ 1782154819005317120
author Tharakaraman, Kannan
Bodenreider, Olivier
Landsman, David
Spouge, John L.
Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo
author_facet Tharakaraman, Kannan
Bodenreider, Olivier
Landsman, David
Spouge, John L.
Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo
author_sort Tharakaraman, Kannan
collection PubMed
description A number of previous studies have predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) by exploiting the position of genomic landmarks like the transcriptional start site (TSS). The studies’ methods are generally too computationally intensive for genome-scale investigation, so the full potential of ‘positional regulomics’ to discover TFBSs and determine their function remains unknown. Because databases often annotate the genomic landmarks in DNA sequences, the methodical exploitation of positional regulomics has become increasingly urgent. Accordingly, we examined a set of 7914 human putative promoter regions (PPRs) with a known TSS. Our methods identified 1226 eight-letter DNA words with significant positional preferences with respect to the TSS, of which only 608 of the 1226 words matched known TFBSs. Many groups of genes whose PPRs contained a common word displayed similar expression profiles and related biological functions, however. Most interestingly, our results included 78 words, each of which clustered significantly in two or three different positions relative to the TSS. Often, the gene groups corresponding to different positional clusters of the same word corresponded to diverse functions, e.g. activation or repression in different tissues. Thus, different clusters of the same word likely reflect the phenomenon of ‘positional regulation’, i.e. a word's regulatory function can vary with its position relative to a genomic landmark, a conclusion inaccessible to methods based purely on sequence. Further integrative analysis of words co-occurring in PPRs also yielded 24 different groups of genes, likely identifying cis-regulatory modules de novo. Whereas comparative genomics requires precise sequence alignments, positional regulomics exploits genomic landmarks to provide a ‘poor man's alignment’. By exploiting the phenomenon of positional regulation, it uses position to differentiate the biological functions of subsets of TFBSs sharing a common sequence motif.
format Text
id pubmed-2377430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23774302008-05-14 The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site Tharakaraman, Kannan Bodenreider, Olivier Landsman, David Spouge, John L. Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo Nucleic Acids Res Computational Biology A number of previous studies have predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) by exploiting the position of genomic landmarks like the transcriptional start site (TSS). The studies’ methods are generally too computationally intensive for genome-scale investigation, so the full potential of ‘positional regulomics’ to discover TFBSs and determine their function remains unknown. Because databases often annotate the genomic landmarks in DNA sequences, the methodical exploitation of positional regulomics has become increasingly urgent. Accordingly, we examined a set of 7914 human putative promoter regions (PPRs) with a known TSS. Our methods identified 1226 eight-letter DNA words with significant positional preferences with respect to the TSS, of which only 608 of the 1226 words matched known TFBSs. Many groups of genes whose PPRs contained a common word displayed similar expression profiles and related biological functions, however. Most interestingly, our results included 78 words, each of which clustered significantly in two or three different positions relative to the TSS. Often, the gene groups corresponding to different positional clusters of the same word corresponded to diverse functions, e.g. activation or repression in different tissues. Thus, different clusters of the same word likely reflect the phenomenon of ‘positional regulation’, i.e. a word's regulatory function can vary with its position relative to a genomic landmark, a conclusion inaccessible to methods based purely on sequence. Further integrative analysis of words co-occurring in PPRs also yielded 24 different groups of genes, likely identifying cis-regulatory modules de novo. Whereas comparative genomics requires precise sequence alignments, positional regulomics exploits genomic landmarks to provide a ‘poor man's alignment’. By exploiting the phenomenon of positional regulation, it uses position to differentiate the biological functions of subsets of TFBSs sharing a common sequence motif. Oxford University Press 2008-05 2008-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2377430/ /pubmed/18367472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn137 Text en © 2008 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Computational Biology
Tharakaraman, Kannan
Bodenreider, Olivier
Landsman, David
Spouge, John L.
Mariño-Ramírez, Leonardo
The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site
title The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site
title_full The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site
title_fullStr The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site
title_full_unstemmed The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site
title_short The biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site
title_sort biological function of some human transcription factor binding motifs varies with position relative to the transcription start site
topic Computational Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18367472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn137
work_keys_str_mv AT tharakaramankannan thebiologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT bodenreiderolivier thebiologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT landsmandavid thebiologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT spougejohnl thebiologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT marinoramirezleonardo thebiologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT tharakaramankannan biologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT bodenreiderolivier biologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT landsmandavid biologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT spougejohnl biologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite
AT marinoramirezleonardo biologicalfunctionofsomehumantranscriptionfactorbindingmotifsvarieswithpositionrelativetothetranscriptionstartsite